Benchmark network & data sharing
Beacon's benchmarks let you see how your growth and retention compare to similar companies. They only work because companies contribute — anonymously. This page explains exactly what you'd be sharing, the protections around it, and the choice you make at sign-up.
What you contribute
If you join the benchmark network, your workspace contributes pre-computed, aggregated statistics — figures like retention or growth for your metric and peer group. That's it. Your raw records never leave your workspace. Your company's identity, your individual customers, and your prices are never shared and never made identifiable.
The protections — how anonymity is kept
Contributing and viewing are separate choices
Seeing the community benchmarks and contributing your own anonymised data are two different consents. On a paid plan you can do either, both, or neither — and change your mind at any time.
On Free, contributing is part of the deal
The Free plan exists because companies contribute to the benchmark corpus — that's what makes it free. So on Free, contributing your anonymised aggregates is a condition of the plan, and you agree to it, plainly, at sign-up. If you'd rather not share, Beacon isn't free for you — a paid plan is the option.
On paid plans, it's a reciprocal choice: contribute and you receive the full benchmark intelligence back; opt out and the benchmarks simply stay off for you.
Leaving the network
You can leave at any time, which stops any future contribution. Statistics already contributed remain in the pool in their aggregated, non-identifying form — because they can't be traced back to you, they don't need to be unwound. On the Free plan, leaving the network means moving off Free.
The consent you give
At sign-up, the choice is presented as an explicit, plain-language step — not buried in a long agreement. The wording shown is:
For counselConfirm this meets the GDPR standard for freely-given, specific, informed and unambiguous consent — including the "condition of Free" framing (which counsel should pressure-test against the "freely given" requirement), the separability of viewing vs. contributing, and the treatment of already-contributed aggregates on withdrawal. Round-size / valuation benchmarks, if offered, need their own separate consent scope.